The RESTRICT Act (Senate Bill 686), would allow the U.S. government to “charge you with a felony and $1 million for having a VPN.”

Would the RESTRICT Act criminalize the use of VPNs? Here’s what to know about the bill

Visit also the Congress Page to read the full version of the Senate Bill 686:

  • The RESTRICT Act, Senate Bill 686, would give the U.S. Department of Commerce broad power to regulate technology owned or controlled by foreign adversaries, including China. If passed, the bill would not guarantee a TikTok ban, although lawmakers have raised national security concerns about the social media platform.
  • A virtual private network, or VPN, provides an encrypted connection over the internet from a device to a network. This connection allows for the transmission of sensitive data by preventing unauthorized people from eavesdropping on the traffic.
  • Senate Bill 686 does not criminalize possession of a VPN. But some experts are concerned that the bill, if passed, would impose criminal penalties for using a virtual private network to access TikTok if the app is banned. However, the legislation does not mention “virtual private networks” or “VPNs” and the bill sponsors said the legislation’s criminal provisions are aimed at corporations and executives, not individuals.

As Congress contemplates a potential ban on the popular social media app TikTok, some Americans are already considering ways around such a prohibition. But would, for example, using a virtual private network to access TikTok result in a long prison sentence and hefty fines? Not exactly. Let’s take a deeper look at the legislation in question.

A federal bill that could ban TikTok is stoking confusion and inspiring misleading claims.

The Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act, or RESTRICT Act, aims to mitigate national security threats posed by technology controlled by foreign adversaries, like TikTok.

The bill, introduced in March by Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and John Thune, R-S.D., is focused on threats from foreign adversaries. But some social media users, politicians and political pundits claim everyday Americans will also be targeted.

An April 11 Instagram reel claimed the RESTRICT Act would allow the United States government to “charge you with a felony and $1 million for having a VPN.”

This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

Tulsi Gabbard, an independent who was once a Democratic representative for Hawaii, made a similar claim, saying the RESTRICT Act criminalizes the use of VPNs, with severe penalties for violators.

However, these claims lack context about the RESTRICT Act’s scope and how the measure could change as it progresses through Congress.

What is the RESTRICT Act?

The RESTRICT Act, Senate Bill 686, would give the commerce secretary broad power to regulate technology owned or controlled by six countries that have adversarial relationships with the U.S.: China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela.

Under this legislation, the Commerce Department would have the authority to “identify, deter, disrupt, prevent, prohibit, investigate and mitigate transactions” involving information and communications technology products and services linked to a foreign adversary “that pose an undue or unacceptable risk to U.S. national security or the safety of U.S. persons.”

The bill does not mention TikTok, and its passage does not guarantee the social media app will be banned.

Warner and Thune have shared concerns that TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, could share user data with China and threaten national security in the U.S. But unlike other legislation aimed at restricting TikTok, Warner and Thune’s bill takes a broader approach that doesn’t single out any particular app or technology.

“We need a comprehensive, risk-based approach that proactively tackles sources of potentially dangerous technology before they gain a foothold in America, so we aren’t playing Whac-A-Mole and scrambling to catch up once they’re already ubiquitous,” Warner said when announcing the bill.

The bill was introduced in the Senate and has been referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. It has not yet been debated or voted on. Besides Warner and Thune, two dozen senators from both parties had sponsored the bill, as of April 19.

The White House also endorsed the bill when it was introduced, calling it “a systematic framework for addressing technology-based threats to the security and safety of Americans.”

Worth it to pay a visit to POLITIFACT, to read the full article. Please, follow the link: POLITIFACT


Instagram reel, April 11, 2023

Tulsi Gabbard, Instagram reel, April 9, 2023

Email interview, Rachel Cohen, spokesperson for Sen. Mark Warner, April 14, 2023

Email interview, Ryan Wrasse, spokesperson for Sen. John Thune, April 14, 2023

Email interview, Ashley Gorski, senior staff attorney with ACLU’s National Security Project, April 14, 2023

Email interview, Sarah Philips, campaigner for Fight for the Future, April 13, 2023, “S.686 – RESTRICT Act,” accessed April 17, 2023

Sen. Mark Warner, “Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Tackle National Security Threats from Foreign Tech,” March 7, 2023

White House, “Statement from National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on the Introduction of the RESTRICT Act,” March 7, 2023

Sen. Mark Warner, Twitter thread, March 31, 2023

Sen. Mark Warner, Tweet, March 30, 2023

Wall Street Journal, “Our Bill Is the Best Way to Counter the TikTok Threat,” April 5, 2023

Verify, “Verifying claims about the RESTRICT Act and VPN use for restricted apps or sites,” April 10, 2023

Cisco, “What Is a VPN? – Virtual Private Network,” accessed April 17, 2023

Electronic Frontier Foundation, “The Broad, Vague RESTRICT Act Is a Dangerous Substitute for Comprehensive Data Privacy Legislation,” April 4, 2023

Lawfare, “Two New Bills on TikTok and Beyond: The DATA Act and RESTRICT Act,” March 23, 2023

Reason, “Could the RESTRICT Act criminalize the use of VPNs?,” March 29, 2023 

CNN Business, “TikTok ban: US senators unveil bipartisan bill empowering Biden to ban social media platform and other services,” March 8, 2023

NBC News, “White House backs bipartisan bill that could be used to ban TikTok,” March 7, 2023